Bad Astronomy Newsletter

Share this post

Truly weird JWST images of a truly weird object: Supernova 1987A

badastronomy.substack.com

Discover more from Bad Astronomy Newsletter

For curious people who want to learn more about Earth, space, the Universe... and who love reality for what it is, not what others tell them it should be. I have opinions, too: politics, life, climate science, and such as well. I'll write about 'em.
Over 20,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Truly weird JWST images of a truly weird object: Supernova 1987A

We’ve been studying it for over 35 years and still don’t really understand it

Sep 4, 2023
55
Share this post

Truly weird JWST images of a truly weird object: Supernova 1987A

badastronomy.substack.com
17
Share
The edge-on disk galaxy NGC 5866. Credit: NASA, ESA, and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA); W. Keel (University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa)

September 4, 2023   Issue #612

Subscribers should put a ring on it

Pic o’ the Letter

A cool or lovely or mind-bending astronomical image/video with a description so you can grok it

Oh, I’ve been waiting a long, long time to see this: JWST finally observed Supernova 1987A!

Check THIS out.

A thick and fuzzy ring of material glows eerily surrounding a blobby blue structure shaped like a keyhole. Two very faint arcs of light extend above and below it. Stars are scattered throughout.
Supernova 1987A and the bizarre structure of gas and dust around it. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Mikako Matsuura (Cardiff University), Richard Arendt (NASA-GSFC, UMBC), Claes Fransson (Stockholm University), Josefin Larsson (KTH), Alyssa Pagan (STScI)

Yeah, bizarre, right? And I’ve known how strange this object is for a very long time now…

SN 1987A (and those in the know call it) was once a blue supergiant star, far more massive than the Sun, in the Milky Way’s companion galaxy called the Large Magellanic Cloud (or LMC). It’s about 170,000 light-years away, give or take. Thing is, it blew up. Done exploded. Bang! Supernova.

The light from this event reached Earth in February 1987 (hence the name), and it’s no exaggeration to say it revolutionized astronomy. The brightest supernova in 400 years*, pretty much every telescope on and above (and even under, since it was detected by neutrino observatories which are underground) the planet turned their eyes to see what they could see, and they saw a lot. Back on my Very Old Site I have a bunch of articles I wrote about it; you can start with this one and each links to the next in the series at the bottom.

I studied Hubble images of this object for my PhD, so it’s very gratifying and amazing to see images of it from JWST! But what the heck are we seeing?

A side-by-side display where the original image described above is on the left, and the same image with various features labeled is on the right.
Same as above, but with several features labeled in the image on the right. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, Mikako Matsuura (Cardiff University), Richard Arendt (NASA-GSFC, UMBC), Claes Fransson (Stockholm University), Josefin Larsson (KTH), Alyssa Pagan (STScI)

[Let me start by saying no paper was released with this image, so my descriptions below are based on the image itself, what I know about JWST, and my studies of the weirdo nebula around it over the years. Fairly warned be thee, says I, and this with an earth-mass of salt.]

The bluish blob in the middle shaped like a keyhole (or, better, a Goldfish cracker) is the expanding debris from the explosion, the outer layers of the star torn apart and flung outwards by the event. Moving at a decent fraction of the speed of light, it’s grown visibly over time (Hubble images taken over the years show this very dramatically). It’s colored teal here, which means the light you’re seeing is at a wavelength of 1.64 microns, using a filter that preferentially selects light from glowing iron. When stars explode they make a lot of iron, so that tracks.


Want even MORE in-depth coverage of *the entire Universe*? I can help with that. Paid subbies get two more issues a week, too!


Here’s where things get tricky. Before it exploded, starting maybe 20,000 years ago, the star started blowing out a complex wind of material. For reasons we still don’t know, the star must have either been rotating rapidly or was surrounded by a thick disk of gaseous material over its equator. The winds couldn’t push against it, so they inflated upwards and downwards, creating a huge hourglass-shaped double-lobed structure. I do mean huge: It’s roughly 5 light-years across. Immense. It’s tipped to our line of sight by about 45°. We see it best around its edges, like a soap bubble, so it looks like a pair of intersecting ellipses with a brighter, thicker ring in the middle. This diagram might help you picture it.

The elliptical ring of dots around the expanding debris is part of that thicker inner ring, the origin of which is still unknown despite being studied for more than 35 years (and a brilliant paper on it). The ring is made of gas including hydrogen and oxygen, and is over a light-year in diameter. It’s clumpy, and when the shock wave from the supernova hit it the clumps lit up like a string of pearls.

It looks like the debris itself is about to hit the ring at the top and bottom, but that’s an illusion of perspective. We see it at an angle, so while it looks like the debris almost overlaps the ring, look at the sides: That’s the stuff in the plane of the ring, and it’s well inside the ring (think of it like a football that’s vertical inside a horizontal hula hoop). It’ll be decades, I suspect, before that debris slams into the ring. That’ll be a thing to see.

An ellipse of bright clumps of gas colored red around the goldfish-shaped fuzzy material from the supernova.
The inner ring seen by Hubble in November 2003 shows the older “string of pearls” structure surrounding the oddly shaped expanding debris from supernova itself. Credit: NASA, P. Challis, R. Kirshner (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics) and B. Sugerman (STScI)

All the fuzzy orangey stuff around the ring is hydrogen gas (given the color, it was taken using the 4.05 micron filter, which selects for infrared light from hydrogen). We saw hints of that in the Hubble images, which at the time I speculated (in the early 90s!) was gas above the plane of the inner ring, possibly in the hourglass structure. I’m still not 100% sure what it is, but I think it might be gas blown off by the star before it blew up, now being hit by the explosion shock wave. Totally guessing here. The whole structure might be filled with gas like that but we don’t see it because the shock wave hasn’t driven out that far yet. Again, I’m speculating. Hopefully a paper will come out with a more data-driven diagnosis.

Know someone who loves astronomy and would get a kick out of this article? Please share it!

Share

The press release notes two very faint crescents of material color-coded blue inside the ring, which are pointed out in the annotated image above on the right. These may be the leading edges of material blasted away by the explosion. It’s hard to say what their 3D structure is. The material could be a giant ellipsoid, like a rugby ball. If so — and there’s reason to think that, since the inner debris is extended above and below the plane of the ring — the crescents may be edge-brightened like a soap bubble (I’ve explained this sort of thing before).

I’m having a hard time interpreting this, but it could mean the outer edge of the debris actually is getting very close to the inner ring. This material will be pretty thin compared to the denser goldfish stuff, but when (if) it hits the energy it’ll deposit into the ring will be huge. The ring’’ll light up like Clark Griswold’s house at Christmas.

This stellar explosion taught us vast amounts about how massive stars end their lives. For me personally one of the biggest impacts it had on me — besides getting my degree and all that happened because of that — was seeing how objects can change over really very short periods of time. I could see differences immediately between images we took just a year or two apart! Now it’s been over 35 years, and the changes in this weird structure are incredible… as has been our evolving ability to observe it. We get better at this all the time, and I’m glad I’m around to watch it unfold.


* Mea culpa: I originally wrote that this was the closest supernova in 400 years, but I forgot about G1.9+0.3! It exploded on the other side of our Milky Way, and its light reach us a little over a century ago, but was obscured by so much dust that it wasn’t discovered until recently. No one on Earth saw it at the time because it was far too faint. Thanks to BANner Scott Harrington for reminding me of this!

Et alia

You can email me at thebadastronomer@gmail.com (though replies can take a while), and all my social media outlets are gathered together at about.me. Also, if you don’t already, please subscribe to this newsletter! And feel free to tell a friend or nine, too. Thanks!

Bad Astronomy Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

55
Share this post

Truly weird JWST images of a truly weird object: Supernova 1987A

badastronomy.substack.com
17
Share
17 Comments
Share this discussion

Truly weird JWST images of a truly weird object: Supernova 1987A

badastronomy.substack.com
Daniel Appleton
Writes Daniel’s Substack
Sep 4Liked by Phil Plait

WE'RE BEING WATCHED. Woooooooo ! Then the aliens saw how bats--t insane we can be.

Seriously, beautiful images.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
John E Simpson
Sep 4Liked by Phil Plait

One of my favorite sentences from that series at The Old Site: "Stars, like people, behave the way they do because of internal struggles": !!!

You mentioned a star superimposed on the lower left outer ring, which was (at least at the time of writing) being called "Plait's star." That star, you said, turned out not to be part of the 1987A event at all -- just coincidentally overlapped that bit of it. I see there are also two other very bright stars -- one close to (but not on) the lower RIGHT outer ring, and one apparently on the UPPER right outer ring. Are those also coincidental alignments?

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
6 replies by Phil Plait and others
15 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Phil Plait
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing